<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UI Cleanup: Telegraph Ryder Cup Scores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores#comment-102518</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores#comment-102518</guid>
		<description>First I will like to says this post was useless to the creative process you guy's are trying to pass to us reader. 
If you really want to make a point give us an example of the site where I quote "I will head over to another site that is more interactive" like that you can make a constructive study.
Question 1) Do you have any idea the amount of traffic a page like this get while the ryder cup is on.
Question 2) You says "worth spending this time (minimal)". Do you have any idea the amount of time it it take to implement rich user interface on this kind of high traffic website?

Just re-think for a second the load on 1. the production server 2. the database request 3. the caching framework.

Please don't take this the wrong way but there is a difference between developing a prototype or funky website that will get 1000 request when people discover it and a high traffic website that will 100 thousand of request per minutes over a reather long period.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First I will like to says this post was useless to the creative process you guy&#8217;s are trying to pass to us reader.<br />
If you really want to make a point give us an example of the site where I quote &#8220;I will head over to another site that is more interactive&#8221; like that you can make a constructive study.<br />
Question 1) Do you have any idea the amount of traffic a page like this get while the ryder cup is on.<br />
Question 2) You says &#8220;worth spending this time (minimal)&#8221;. Do you have any idea the amount of time it it take to implement rich user interface on this kind of high traffic website?</p>
<p>Just re-think for a second the load on 1. the production server 2. the database request 3. the caching framework.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t take this the wrong way but there is a difference between developing a prototype or funky website that will get 1000 request when people discover it and a high traffic website that will 100 thousand of request per minutes over a reather long period.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajaxianfading</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores#comment-102283</link>
		<dc:creator>ajaxianfading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores#comment-102283</guid>
		<description>this is news???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is news???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MojoMark</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores#comment-101983</link>
		<dc:creator>MojoMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ui-cleanup-telegraph-ryder-cup-scores#comment-101983</guid>
		<description>Would it really add to your experience to see this in Ajax? Doing it because it's cool to do doesn't mean you should do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it really add to your experience to see this in Ajax? Doing it because it&#8217;s cool to do doesn&#8217;t mean you should do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
